April 12, 2015 by arthuryinfan
The methodology flaws in Hinman’s acupuncture clinical trial, Part I: Design and results interpretation. J Integr Med 2015; 13 (2) : 65–68.
Posted in commentary | Tagged Acupuncture, acupuncture clinical trial, Australia, chronic knee pain, design, Flaws, integrative medicine, JAMA, Journal of American Medical Association, methodology flaws, Rana Hinman, RCT, results interpretation, Statistics | Leave a Comment
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
McLean Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Blog at WordPress.com.